INTERNATIONAL SIGN ASSOCIATION APPLAUDS SUPREME COURT DECISION IN CITY OF AUSTIN V. REAGAN NATIONAL ADVERTISING
ALEXANDRIA, VA – April 21, 2022 – The Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the traditional regulatory distinction between on-premises signs and off-premises signs (billboards) is content-neutral and therefore constitutional. The ruling came in a closely watched case, City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising. A lower court had ruled that cities could not differentiate between the two types of signs.
ISA has long contended that the traditional regulatory distinction between on-premises signs and billboards is location-based, not content-based, and that eliminating the distinction would be harmful to the on-premises sign industry. ISA submitted two amicus briefs to SCOTUS urging them to rule in favor of on-premises signs.
"We submitted our briefs to educate the Court on the practical and legal differences between on-premises signs and billboards, and to point out the importance of on-premises signs to America’s small businesses, and it appears that the justices took our advice to heart," said David Hickey, ISA's vice president of advocacy. "Thanks to the Court's decision in Austin v. Reagan, we will have regulatory certainty across the country and our industry can continue to succeed and grow.”
ISA will continue monitoring these legal developments and analyzing what they mean for the sign and graphics industry and will keep members and the industry informed as we understand the implications more fully.
- Read ISA's amicus brief urging SCOTUS to take up the case here
- Read ISA's amicus brief arguing that SCOTUS should maintain the traditional regulatory distinction between on-premise signs and billboards here
- Check out ISA's webinar on what the Austin v. Reagan decision means for the sign and graphics industry here